Skip to main content
Pulse trends are meaningful when the same measure is repeated under comparable conditions.

​
What can form a pulse trend

  • The program’s repeated eNPS item.
  • An exact canonical anchor repeated across cycles.
  • Another pinned question whose wording and scale remain unchanged.
Rotating questions can be analyzed in the cycles where they appear, but they do not automatically create a continuous series.

​
Pulse versus engagement survey scores

Do not connect an overall engagement-survey average to a pulse average. They are based on different instruments and may contain different questions, scales, and category weights. An engagement survey and a pulse can be compared only at the level of an exact shared canonical question with the same wording and response scale. Even then, describe the context and timing.

​
Response rate is not engagement

Response rate measures participation. Engagement scores summarize answers. A high response rate does not guarantee a high engagement score, and a low rate can make any score less representative.
Similar names do not make two metrics identical. “Engagement,” “pulse engagement,” and “participation” must not be merged into one trend unless their definitions match.
No. The overall averages use different question sets and are not one continuous metric.
Yes, when it is the exact canonical item with unchanged wording and scale. Compare that item, not the two survey-wide averages.
The question may not have appeared in every cycle, or a cycle may be hidden because it did not meet the anonymity threshold.
Pair the number with participation, audience changes, comments, business events, and actions taken between cycles.